Question
https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/questions/smp/release-and-publish/publicly-available/peer-review
  • attribute
    https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/smp/peer-review
  • is_collection
    False
  • is_optional
    False
  • help_en
    For software in a scientific context, it is reasonable to subject it to an (open) review process. This can be in the form of a review or also a certification. For scientific software review, for example, there is the Journal of Open Source Software. Besides this, subject-specific standards for reviewing scientific software are also becoming established, for example in archaeology. Further literature references on the topic may also be of interest: * Eisty and Carver (2022): Developers perception of peer code review in research software development, In: Empirical Software Engineering 27, 13, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10053-x. * Bosu (2013): Modeling Modern Code Review Practices in Open Source Software Development Organizations, IDoESE '13 Baltimore, https://www2.umbc.edu/eseiw2013/idoese/pdf/eseiw2013_IDoESE_188.pdf.
  • text_en
    Is (Open) Peer Review planned for the software?
  • help_de
    Für Software im wissenschaftlichen Kontext kann es Sinn ergeben, diese einem (offenen) Begutachtungsprozess zu unterziehen. Dies kann in Form einer Rezension oder auch einer Zertifizierung geschehen. Für wissenschaftliche Software gibt es beispielsweise das Journal of Open Source Software. Parallel dazu etablieren sich auch fachspezifische Standards zur Begutachtung von wissenschaftlicher Software, wie beispielsweise in der Archäologie. Weitere Literaturhinweise zu dem Thema können ebenfalls interessant sein: * Eisty und Carver (2022): Developers perception of peer code review in research software development, In: Empirical Software Engineering 27, 13, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10053-x. * Bosu (2013): Modeling Modern Code Review Practices in Open Source Software Development Organizations, IDoESE '13 Baltimore, https://www2.umbc.edu/eseiw2013/idoese/pdf/eseiw2013_IDoESE_188.pdf.
  • text_de
    Ist (offenes) Peer Review für die Software geplant?
  • widget_type
    textarea
  • value_type
    text
  • conditions