comment

The stipulation that reused and created data are of the same type (= and thus capable to be integrated) is problematic, since this implies properties of the data that are not a given. May be this shoud be reformulated to: Is the connection between re-used and created data ensures (which goes into the provenance realm)

attribute

https://rdmorganiser.github.io/terms/domain/project/dataset/integration

is_collection

False

is_optional

False

help_en

For example, how is the origin and quality of the data documented?

text_en

Is integration between reused and newly created data ensured? If so, how?

help_de

Wie wird z. B. Herkunft und Qualität der Daten dokumentiert?

text_de

Wird die Integration zwischen nachgenutzten und erzeugten Daten gewährleistet? Wenn ja, wie?

help_fr

Comment sont documentées l'origine, la qualité etc. des données ?

text_fr

L'intégration entre les données réutilisées et nouvellement créées est-elle assurée ? Si oui, par quels moyens ?

help_it

Come vengono documentate l'origine, la qualità ecc. dei dati?

text_it

L'integrazione tra i dati riutilizzati e quelli creati è assicurata? In caso affermativo, attraverso quali misure?

help_es

¿Cómo se documentan el origen y la calidad de los datos?

text_es

¿Está asegurada la integración entre los datos reutilizados y los recién creados? En caso afirmativo, ¿por qué medio?

widget_type

textarea

value_type

text